So, for those of you who don’t know – in which case, may I say what a nice
rock that is you’ve been living under – last Friday Apple released the third
iteration of the iPhone (which is either called the “iPhone 3G S” or the
“iPhone 3GS”, depending on when and where you look). The differences from its
predecessor – faster, more memory, far better camera, compass – make it an
attractive option to 3G owners (especially the weaker-willed
of them); to those who stuck with their original iPhones, it’s a fantastic
upgrade. I am one of these people.
For existing iPhone 3G owners though, there’s a snag stemming from the fact
that the original iPhone – unlike just about every other mainstream mobile
from the last few years – was not subsidised by the network carrying it: in
the case of the UK, this was O2. The way this works for most phones is
that the network pays a large portion of the phone’s cost, in return for the
customer signing up to an n-month contract with them. As the Macalope puts
it, it’s a loan with the repayments baked into the cost of the
service contract. As a result, when the iPhone 3G came out last year, existing
iPhone owners had no outstanding loan payments to make, so O2 quite rightly
allowed them an early upgrade. This time around, iPhone 3G owners, who had
bought their handsets at the lower “loan price”, were somewhat put out to hear
that they would either have to wait out their contract (tedious), buy out
their contract (expensive, at a minimum of £35/month × 6 months == £210), or
buy the new phone on a Pay and Go deal (seriously expensive, at a starting
price of £440.40 for the 16GB model). Cue
enraged rants, online petitions, threats of defection to other
networks and other general foot-stamping.
In response to (or possibly anticipation of) these complaints, O2 have put up
an Upgrade FAQs page on their site, addressing the concerns of
the irate iPhone owners and explaining why they won’t offer the same terms
that they did when upgrading last time. This page, however, did not answer my
most pressing question: what are the upgrade terms for upgrading from the
original 2G iPhone to the 3GS? There is plenty of spiel about how “the
original 2G iPhone was unique as customers bought the device outright” and
“contract terms of iPhone 3G are […] the same as for every other handset we
sell”, but nothing about upgrade terms from original iPhones. So I popped into
the nearest O2 store and asked them directly.
My answer? Exactly the same as if I were upgrading from an iPhone 3G. I
would have to wait out or buy out the remaining months of my contract, or pay
through the nose to buy the phone outright.
Not entirely trusting this (or perhaps not wanting to), I headed over to
Cambridge’s local Apple store and asked them the same question. Same answer.
In short, O2 are not offering early upgrades to 3G owners, for which they give
perfectly valid reasons. They are also not offering early upgrades to original
iPhone owners either, for which the originally stated reasons no longer apply.
The only reason I can think of that applies is “because we can; because you
signed a contract, and we know you’ll probably be staying with us anyway”. I
honestly can’t see how this makes economic sense from O2’s perspective: there
are no loan payments to recoup, and original iPhone owners will have an
absolute maximum of seven months left on their contracts (I don’t believe
there was a 24-month contract available for the 3G). Given that they are
turning up asking to sign up for up to two years, turning them away and
pissing them off in one smooth motion seems to be a very bad plan.
For some reason, I have to say I’m feeling remarkably sanguine about the whole
affair. Sure, I’d love to have a beautiful new iPhone at a price that isn’t
batshit insane, and I’d love to have it right now, but I wouldn’t have
signed up to my original 18-month contract if I wasn’t willing to serve out an
18-month contract. So I’m not incensed at the prospect of waiting until
September or October to get a faster, shinier phone with faster, shinier
internet access, a faster, shinier camera and a compass which, while not noted
for being fast, certainly looks pretty shiny. I’m just a little
disappointed that O2 haven’t thought to – or have decided not to – extend the
same courtesy to original iPhone owners this time around that they did before.
There’s a possibility that this will change at some point between now and
September, and that I’ll be able to upgrade, but I’m not holding my breath.
My IM client of choice (pretty much ever since I
first bought a Mac) has been the excellent Adium. It gives me access
to all my accounts, it gives me a shiny-shiny Mac-like interface with more
keyboard shortcuts than I can shake a large keyboard-shortcut-shaking stick
at, and it has improved greatly with every release, of which there have been
many.
What it hasn’t offered me, at least until now, has been the ability to sign on
in invisible mode. When you quit, Adium remembers the status of each of your
accounts, and returns to that status when you next launch the program. Very
useful, unless you want to sign on invisibly without everyone on your contact
list seeing you online for a joyous but fleeting second.
There are several solutions to this problem, some more pleasant than others.
There are solutions involving writing AppleScripts, there are solutions
involving setting yourself into invisible mode before you sign off (although,
as Ryan Tomayko points out in an otherwise unrelated article,
The Thing About Git, solutions which involve the words “you should
have” are dangerous things). None of these were good enough for me.
Today, after a bit of poking around on the Adium bug tracker, I
found the solution I needed: if you hold down the Shift key when
you launch Adium, it starts itself up but doesn’t connect any of your
accounts. You are then free to select invisibility at your leisure.
I have a confession to make: I don’t like passwords.
To clarify that statement, I don’t like seeing passwords. A row of asterisks
is fine: perfectly happy with that. A row of little black circles is even
better: after all, it’s prettier. But looking at a monitor, sheet of paper or
Post-It note and seeing a password staring back at me sends a little shiver
running down my spine. Some cultures are reputed to believe that taking a
photograph of someone steals a little piece of their soul; I tend to think
much the same about writing down someone’s password. “Keep it secret”, as they
say; “keep it safe”.
This, of course, is pretty much the standard geek attitude to passwords: they
are to be guarded with one’s life. Offer a geek a
Mars bar for their password, and they’ll offer you an angry stream
of verbal abuse. Or possibly a lecture on social engineering and user account
security. Knowing most geeks, it’ll probably be somewhere between the two.
All of this leads up to a discussion of two things: the OAuth
protocol which aims, amongst other laudable goals, to help safeguard users’
passwords, and the distinctly unnerving trend which
Jeremy
Keith has christened the password anti-pattern,
which really doesn’t.
Read on…
This weekend, I have been clearing out the house that
Jo and I have been sharing
this past year. As soon as is feasible, I plan to find a flat somewhere in or
around Cambridge and shift all of my worldly possessions into it.
This week, Ben Ward
has been clearing out the London flat that he has been sharing with
David Singleton this past year.
Tomorrow, he plans to emigrate to San Francisco and work for
Yahoo! Brickhouse.
I wish us both the best of luck. It’s going to be interesting.
Well, things have been more than a little insane of late: I’ve gone from a fixed-term contract to full-term employment (with Hyperspheric), moved house (with Jo, giving me an opportunity to use XFN’s co-resident attribute) and engaged in a survival exercise whereby I had to cope for two weeks with neither fridge nor delicious internets (the latter of which has been solved by Be who, by and large, have been excellent).
The majority of the insanity, however, is now mercifully behind me (with the exception of my brand new copy of Bioshock, which seems to feature insanity fairly prominently), so it’s now time to look forward to the future. And to a new experience.
It’s quite a popular topic of conversation: those lucky people who have done it before talk about how fantastic it is, and many of those who have not yet had the pleasure think about what it would be like. Those in this latter category, such as myself, wonder who it’s going to be with, whether we’re going to be any good at it, and of course there’s the worry that it’s going to be over almost before it starts.
Not to mention all the fun that’s going to happen between sessions.
I’m talking, of course, about BarCamp Brighton, at which I lose my BarCamp virginity. As the aspects of last year’s South by Southwest which I remember most fondly were the sense of community and the bouncing around of thoughts and ideas, this looks to be precisely that, without the registration fee or the 12-hour journey time. For those of you who will be attending, I look forward eagerly to seeing you there.
Oh, and I’ve ordered myself a shiny new MacBook: after all, I hear these things can be much more fun if you bring the right toys along.